The Case: Uncle Rico has been charged with the crime of theft. Specifically, Uncle Rico stands accused of stealing a handful of tater tots from his nephew, Napoleon. The first witness for the prosecution is Pedro, student body president. The following is a transcript from the direct examination by the prosecutor at trial:
Q (Prosecutor): Tell me everything you remember about October 20.
A (Pedro): Well, a lot of stuff. That’s the day Napoleon’s tater tots were stolen, you know.
Q: Now, the school served tater tots for lunch day, right?
A: Now that you mention it, I think they did. Hot, steamy tater tots. Mmmmm.
Q: And isn’t it true that you saw Uncle Rico with a handful of tater tots later that afternoon?
A: Yes, I did.
Q: (Showing the witness a small fried item) I am showing you one of the tater tots recovered from Uncle Rico’s house. Is this one of Napoleon’s tots?
A: I guess. It looks like it to me.
Q: I know there was a lot of confusion that day. Did you talk with anyone about what had happened?
A: Well yeah, you see, I was giving my election speech at the time, so I didn’t see anything. But Deb told me the next day that Uncle Rico had reached into Napoleon’s pocket and taken some of the tots.
Q: What did Napoleon say at the time, if anything?
A: Well, I was there when Napoleon discovered that his pocket was empty. He cried, man. He yelled out, "Omigosh, my tots are gone!" And then he cried.
Q: Now, in your experience, has Uncle Rico done this sort of stuff in the past?
A: Yeah. Once, he shot a llama with a BB gun. He’s a pretty bad dude. Stealing tots, that’s nothing for Rico. He’s done a lot worse, I tell you.
Q: To your knowledge, has Uncle Rico ever been convicted of a crime?
A: Yeah. He spent time in jail for theft about 12 years ago. French fries, I think it was. Yeah. He stole some french fries. Got caught.
Question: You are Uncle Rico’s defense attorney. With respect to the evidentiary issues presented in the above line of questioning, please identify each objection that should be raised and explain in detail your legal arguments in support of each such objection.
Americans, on a whole, are a rather paranoid bunch. At least, that is the case if the television is to be believed.* Marketing campaigns and advertisements warn of the dangers of a multiplicity of ills, dangers, diseases, syndromes, and phenomenons. But if you think about it, the most dangerous thing you do is get in your car and drive somewhere. Sharing the road with your fellow drivers is by far more dangerous than terrorist attacks, serial murderers, global warming, or any other thing people usually afraid of. When you are on the road, you are only as safe as the skill level of the drivers around you. And I think you’ll agree with me that it isn’t a very comforting thought.


Protected: At the park